ScienceDirect College Edition
Elsevier’s academic platform
The ScienceDirect homepage provides a few basic search fields (keyword, author name, Journal/Book title, volume, issue and pages) and the ability to browse for content by subject area. The advanced search offers just a few more search fields. Boolean operators, phrase search and parentheses can be used in both search types. Filtering and narrowing of results is possible after the initial search.
Initial search results will contain your subscribed content, open-access content, and content you do not have access to unless you pay extra. The top listed filter allows you to limit to subscribed journals, which eliminates the unsubscribed content and (unfortunately) much of the open-access content.
Users can also filter by publication date, publication title, subject area, and most importantly, article type. Elsevier does a nice job of breaking down their resource types into categories such as research articles, review articles, case reports, discussions, editorials, etc.
One thing to note, that along with published articles, Elsevier will display articles in-press, which include journal pre-proofs, uncorrected proofs, corrected proofs, and withdrawn articles in-press. There doesn't seem to be a way to exclude or filter articles in-press from the search results.
All subscribed and open access articles are available in PDF and HTML. Users can print the HTML directly from the screen or download the article PDF, but there is no email option. The share option allows the user to share a link to the article via email or various social media outlets. The cite option does not create a citation, but allows the user to save to Refworks, or export as a RIS or text file. Database citation generators and the ability to email articles are services most students have come to expect in a database and it is unfortunate that neither of these tools are available in ScienceDirect.
On the full-text article page, Elsevier provides some extras. Recommended articles (articles that other users have read after reading the selected article) appear on the right-hand side of the screen. Data is imported and displayed from the Scopus database, and shows the number of times and where the article has been cited over the past year. Plum Analytics also provides article metrics such as usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. One thing to remember is that all of these “extras” come at the cost of individual privacy (see privacy concerns section below).
There is no need to create an account unless the user wants to take advantage of saved search alerts or would like to receive weekly personalized emails from Elsevier containing article recommendations.
Initialization and Administration
The ScienceDirect website asserts that ScienceDirect “aspires to meet all guidelines established by the World Wide Web Consortium's” WCAG 2.1 and Section 508 criteria. The Science Direct VPAT can be found here.
A 2017 review of ScienceDirect by the Big Ten Academic Alliance revealed some accessibility challenges like wayfinding issues using a screen reader and labels not being programmatically aligned to assistive technologies. Elesevier addressed some of these issues in their response to the Big Ten Alliance Elsevier Response which included adding missing headings and improving screen reader wayfinding. The Tennessee Board of Regents website indicates a conformance date of 12/31/2020, but notes that they are waiting for a response from the vendor.
Our own testing of ScienceDirect using the WAVE plugin did not reveal any significant errors on the main search page. Some errors were found in pdf documents including missing alt text on image buttons and broken same page links. An analysis with axe revealed no errors on the main search page, but errors like missing labels were found in some of the articles and pdfs.
Personal information is retained by Elsevier for as long as necessary. Elsevier states they take precautions to safeguard your personal information but how that is done isn’t spelled out.
ConclusionRecommended improvements aside, Elsevier’s ScienceDirect College Edition contains a lot of useful content. An overlap analysis report run through Alma comparing each of the three collections against EBSCO’s Academic Search Complete showed very little overlap. Colleges interested in beefing up their academic journal holdings in the sciences would do well to consider the three collections, especially the Health and Sciences collection.
If you have any experience with this product, please leave a comment and rate its appropriateness for use in a community college environment.
† The offers and trials information are password protected. Actual prices are confidential between the vendor and the consortium.
For access contact Amy Beadle, Library Consortium Director, 916.800.2175.